Social Mixing and Home–Work Carpooling
Federico Librino, Istituto di Informatica e Telematica del CNR Maria Elena Renda, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Giovanni Resta, Istituto di Informatica e Telematica del CNR Paolo Santi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Fabio Duarte, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Carlo Ratti, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Jinhua Zhao, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
Show Abstract
Shared mobility is widely recognized for its
contribution in reducing carbon footprint, traffic congestion, parking needs and
transportation-related costs in urban and suburban areas. In this context, the
use of carpooling in home-work commute is particularly appealing for its
potential of lessening the number of cars and kilometers traveled, consequently
reducing major causes of traffic in cities. Accordingly, most of the carpooling
algorithms are optimized for reducing total travel time, cost, and other
transportation-related metrics. In this paper, we analyze the benefits of
carpooling from a new angle, posing it as a possible means for favoring social
integration in the city by matching carpoolers taking into account some of their
social characteristics. Building upon a recently introduced network-based
approach to model ride-sharing opportunities, we define two social-related
carpooling problems: how to maximize the number of rides shared between people
belonging to different social groups, and how to maximize the amount of time
people spend together along the ride. For each of the problems, we provide
corresponding optimal and computationally efficient solutions. We then
demonstrate our approach on two data sets collected in the city of Pisa, Italy,
and Cambridge, US, and quantify the potential social benefits of carpooling, and
how they can be traded off with traditional transportation-related metrics. When
collectively considered, the models, algorithms, and results presented in this
paper broaden the perspective from which carpooling problems are typically
analyzed to encompass multiple disciplines including urban planning, public
policy, and social sciences.
|
18-06514
|
“Doing the Right Things” Rather Than “Doing Things Right": A Conceptual Transportation and Land Use Framework for Livability, Sustainability, and Equity in the Era of Driverless Cars
Bruce Appleyard, San Diego State University William Riggs, University of San Francisco
Show Abstract
From the beginning of modern planning, graphic images and
concept diagrams have been used to convey ideas and frame approaches. This paper
develops a conceptual performance measure framework for integrating
transportation and land use policy and planning with regard to driverless cars
or autonomous vehicles (AVs). Building on seminal work on evaluating transit
performance, this model places a premium on service effectiveness and street
livability “doing the right things”, over service efficiency, “doing things
right”, which can be achieved most sustainably through fewer cars, traveling at
slower speeds, and over shorter trips. This paper outlines how this model might
apply to certain street transects and what that means for specific urban
policies with a goal of achieving sustainability, livability, and equity in
future cities.
Based on an optimal scenario, this paper provides
specific policy recommendations and a list of candidate performance measures
that can be used with this conceptual framework to help guide us toward
transportation and land use integration policies and approaches for a future
with driverless cars that is more livable, sustainable, and
equitable.
|
18-05603
|
Urban Transportation Mode Choice and Carbon Emissions in Southeast Asia
Wei-Shiuen Ng, International Transport Forum
Show Abstract
Cities are growing differently across the world, even within the same region, and presenting different transportation trends and challenges. Existing transportation services and travel behavior are some of the key variables shaping future transportation trends and carbon emissions projections. This study uses five developing cities in Southeast Asia to illustrate how different policy scenarios can help cities achieve more sustainable transportation development. Cities in Southeast Asia encompass distinctive characteristics, such as the wide range of transportation alternatives, often in the form of informal transit, and although they are not growing as rapidly as Chinese or Indian cities, their levels of transportation emissions have been increasing consistently. This study examines how different policies and measures will affect transportation mode choice and carbon emissions through the construction of mode choice models and the application of three policy scenarios. Carbon emissions can be reduced by as much as 93 percent in 2050 if cities implement a combination of land use planning changes, public transportation development and economic policies for a modal shift to more energy efficient mode choices. Such policies and measures will therefore be able to contribute to city level climate goals or national climate targets.
|
18-04857
|
The Need for a Whole Systems Approach to Climate Governance: Recognizing the Role of Transport Policy in Stimulating Demand
Louise Reardon, University of Birmingham Greg Marsden, University of Leeds
Show Abstract
Climate change has long been identified as a ‘wicked
problem’. It has been argued that such ‘wicked’ problems require a move away
from ‘command and control’ linear policy thinking where the problem is broken
down into components, to instead a ‘whole systems approach’ which embraces
non-linear and organic thinking…where the primacy of the whole is acknowledged.
The argument of this paper is that to date the UK has failed to address the
climate change challenge in the transport sector due to its siloed linear,
command and control policy approach, which has focused on the supply-side of the
climate change challenge at the expense of the demand side. The UK’s approach
has primarily focused on decarbonisation of the vehicle fleet without addressing
more fundamental questions about how much mobility there is, how this mobility
is generated, and how much mobility should be catered for (the demand side). The
demand side is however crucial, as the scale of the decarbonisation challenge,
and in turn the impact on climate change, is bounded by the level of demand and
how it is configured. We identify the need instead, for a whole systems approach
to thinking about climate change and mobility, which highlights the need for a
more nuanced policy approach, through two UK based case studies; liberalisation
of air travel, and concessionary bus travel. The case studies highlight the
importance of government actions in shaping aspects of demand and, through
examination of how these policies unfold over time, the recursive relationship
between the promotion of demand and the increased challenge of managing it – and
supplying for it.
|
18-04749
|
Assessment of Physical and Ecological Space Consumed by Transport Modes: A Case of Rajkot City, India
Marie-Eve Will, Technical University of Denmark Yannick Cornet, University of Zilina Talat Munshi, Technical University of Denmark
Show Abstract
The space needed by various urban passenger transport
modes varies greatly depending on the size and the speed of vehicles. Available
studies on this topic have shown that public transport and non-motorized
transport can be up to 20 times more space-efficient than the typical car. This
is particularly relevant in urban context where space is a constrained resource.
Yet space use is rarely assessed explicitly in the transport planning practice,
the connection between the low carbon transport planning agenda , and there
exists no standard method for quantifying the use of space in complex urban
settings like that of developing cities. This study builds on the space-time
concept to propose a method for quantifying and comparing the circulation space,
parking space and ecological space between modes. The method is showcased by
evaluating a Low-carbon Comprehensive Mobility Plan (LCMP) scenarios against a
business-as-usual (BAU) scenario in the city of Rajkot, India. Based on a
multi-modal transport model elaborated for the design of the LCMP, the indicator
assesses the overall space-time used by each mode category, both for parking and
travelling. The indicator shows that significantly less space is used by
transport in the LCMP than in the BAU scenario, which provides evidence that
could contribute to alleviating chronic congestion expected from a car- and
motorcycle-based transport development only. This research participates in
creating an assessment framework for low carbon transport development that would
include spatial efficiency concerns.
|
18-04133
|
Nonurban Passenger Travel Demand and CO2 Emissions: A Global Perspective
Guineng Chen, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Vincent Benezech, International Transport Forum
Show Abstract
This study aims to present long-term scenarios on
domestic non-urban passenger mobility and related CO2 emissions up to 2050 at the global level. It uses a
new model developed at the International Transport Forum’s (ITF). Results from
the baseline scenario show that, between 2015 and 2050, non-urban travel demand
may nearly triple by 2050, with CO2 emissions
from the sector doubling. The mode share of private cars will continue to
increase, contributing to more than 70% of the total CO2 emission from the sector. We also introduce a
low-carbon scenario, aiming at reducing the carbon-intensity of travel through
fuel efficiency improvements, increased use of alternative fuel and incentives
for mode shift. The results show the significant impact such measures can have
in addressing the expected growth in emissions. They also highlight the
preponderant role of vehicle technology as a mitigation measure, even though
improving rail and bus services is also needed to further reduce the carbon
footprint of non-urban mobility.
|
18-03905
|
Sustainability Performance Simulation of the U.S. Urban Mobility Policies
Tolga Ercan, Connected Wise LLC Nowreen Keya, University of Central Florida Nuri Cihat Onat, Istanbul Sehir University Omer Tatari, University of Central Florida Naveen Eluru, University of Central Florida
Show Abstract
Heavy dependence on personal vehicle usage in the U.S.
has made the transportation sector one of the greatest contributors to air
pollutant emissions the associated human health concerns. The transportation
mode choices of urban commuters play a key role in the evaluation and management
of these threats. This study investigates the impacts of autonomous vehicles
(AVs) on transportation mode choice and on applicable trends in
transportation-related externalities, carbon emissions, and air pollution for
the year 2050. To this end, in addition to testing various market penetration
scenarios for AVs, this study will analyze common policy applications such as
limiting lane-mile increases on roadways (i.e. limiting the expansion projects)
and introducing carbon-tax policies to vehicle owners from the year 2025 onward.
Demographic parameters and five transportation mode choices for 929
metro/micropolitan areas of the U.S. are processed in simulations of a
fractional split multinomial model. A system dynamics modeling approach is
integrated in this study with discrete-event model outcomes as part of a novel
hybrid simulation model. The results show that policies such as line-mile
increases and carbon taxes have a negligible reduction effect on
transportation-related sustainability impacts. On the other hand, the
introduction of AVs into the U.S. transportation has significant potential to
reduce annual CO2 emissions compared to any
combination of lane-mile and carbon-tax policy scenarios by the year
2050.
|
18-03682
|
Consideration of Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Bicycle Route Planning
Ji Luo, University of California, Riverside Kanok Boriboonsomsin, University of California, Riverside Matthew Barth, University of California, Riverside
Show Abstract
Active transportation modes such as walking and biking
are key elements of sustainable transportation. In order to promote bicycling as
an alternative form of transportation, a holistic approach to improving the
quality of the biking experience is needed. In most areas, bicycle routes are a
subset of vehicle routes where often new bicycle infrastructure is created by
adding bicycle lane(s) to existing rights-of-way. The planning of bicycle routes
typically takes into consideration available right-of-way, existing roadway
infrastructure, vehicular traffic volume, safety concerns, and the built
environment, among other things. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution, on
the other hand, is rarely considered. Indeed, bicyclists are the most vulnerable
to the harmful air pollution due to their direct exposure to vehicular exhaust
and increased breathing rate during biking.
This paper presents a method for incorporating exposure
to traffic-related air pollution as another consideration in the bicycle route
planning process. The method involves creating a streamlined process for
estimating the level of near-road air pollution concentration and developing a
bicycle route planning tool that allows planners and engineers to compare the
exposure of bicyclists to traffic-related air pollution among different bicycle
route options. In addition, this paper demonstrates how to apply the method in
two case studies in the City of Riverside, California. Through these case
studies, it is shown that considering exposure to traffic-related air pollution
can change the outcome of bicycle route planning.
|
18-03044
|
The Impact of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Regional Transportation Planning
Uri Avin, National Center for Smart Growth Alice Grossman, American Association for the Advancement of Science Alexander Bond, Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST) Sheldon Edner, George Mason University Rich Denbow, Cambridge Systematics Kimberly Fisher, National Center for Smart Growth Derek Lombardi, Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
Show Abstract
The HUD funding of the Sustainable Communities
Initiative (SCI), between 2010 and 2012, awarded over $165 million to 74
applicants to pursue sustainability planning in new ways at the regional scale.
The SCI grants were the first Federal dedicated comprehensive planning
discretionary grant program since the 1960s. By design, the program sought to
broaden the typical stakeholders in such efforts – MPOs and Councils of
Government – so as to include NGOs and others. The program also sought to
broaden the typical highway-centric agendas of such efforts by emphasizing
equity, housing, and environmental quality and relating these issues to
multimodal transportation. These interdisciplinary and collaborative
requirements for the program’s competitive Regional Planning grants, ranging
from $225,000 to $ 5,000,000, ushered in a new wave of Regional Sustainable
Development Plans. In 2010, 45 awards were made to regional entities. Their work
was completed by the end of 2013 and it is the focus of this paper. This study
is the first to assess the transportation planning impacts of the trailblazing
Federal Sustainable Communities Initiative (SCI). This project aims to answer
the question of if and how the SCI program has transformed metropolitan
transportation planning. Answering this question helps policy makers and
practitioners shape practical outcomes in the transportation planning field,
such as the way in which Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTPs) and
Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) are developed.
|
18-02813
|
Which Shade of Green? An Interactive Transport Platform for Sustainable Policy Assessment
Ioannis Tsouros, University of the Aegean Amalia Polydoropoulou, University of the Aegean
Show Abstract
The transport sector is accountable for almost one
fourth of the global carbon emissions. Without bold, persistent and diverse
mitigation measures, emissions from transportation are going to increase at a
faster rate and remain a threat to the environment and humanity. Sustainable
transportation is an answer for this threat. This paper is concerned with the
concept, design, and implementation of an interactive sustainable transport
evaluation tool. The development of the final product, the green transport
policy platform, should assist policy-makers and urban planners to evaluate
green policy measures in a more thorough and sophisticated way. The platform is
tested and put into practice in real-life situation and scenario in the Greek
island of Chios. The platform runs on a series of econometric models which are
divided into three different tiers. Initially, the everyday life tier, which
models departure and arrival times and tour structure based on the latent trait
of location specific lifestyle; the active transport measures assessment tier,
which uses a five-module transport simulation model to assess the impact of
active transport promotion measures and a hybrid choice model which measures the
future vehicle purchase choices concerning alternative fuel vehicles and the
effect of latent variables such as the symbolic use of vehicles or the positive
stance towards the environment on the choice.
|
18-02131
|
An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship Between Transport Disadvantage and Subjective Well-Being
Maria Fernanda Viveros, Universidad de Concepcion Juan Carrasco, Universidad de Concepcion Alejandro Tudela, Universidad de Concepcion
Show Abstract
The relationship between well-being and transport has
been mainly discussed in theoretical and qualitative terms. The objective of
this paper is to provide empirical evidence through a quantitative analysis of
people’s well-being, measured by subjective well-being, and the transport
disadvantage, considering mobility variables and self-reported access
limitations or barriers. Using data collected from 241 people from four
neighborhoods in Concepción, Chile, structural equation models were estimated,
showing the existence of relationships between the generated variables and
well-being was empirically demonstrated. The analysis included as key dimensions
not only the people’s travel behavior, but also their knowledge and experience
in non- mandatory activities, as well as their satisfaction with life as a
cognitive component of wellbeing. The analyses from the models suggest that
access barriers to non-mandatory activities had almost no direct correlation
with the different components of wellbeing, with the exception of transport and
activity costs, but only for low-income people. This result reinforces previous
findings in the literature regarding the importance of social exclusion as a
mediating variable between the relationship of transportation disadvantage and
well-being.
|
18-01861
|
Carless in Car Heaven: A Comparison of German and Californian Households
Kathrin Kuehne, Leibniz University, Hannover Suman Mitra, University of California, Irvine Jean-Daniel Saphores, Institution of Transportation Studies
Show Abstract
One approach to making transportation more sustainable
is to transition away from a car-oriented society. Unfortunately, our
understanding of the factors that prompt households to voluntarily forgo their
motor vehicles is limited. The 2008 Mobility in Germany (MiD) and the 2012
California Household Travel Survey (CHTS) provide an opportunity to start
filling this gap. We estimate Generalized Structural Equation Models (GSEM) to
tease out what built environment and socio-economic variables impact the
likelihood that a household is carless (voluntarily or not) in Germany and in
California. Our results show that in both Germany and California, households who
reside in denser neighborhoods, closer to transit stations, who have a lower
income or fewer children, are more likely to be voluntarily carless than to be
motorized. However, households with more education are more likely to be
voluntarily carless in Germany, whereas the reverse is true in California.
Moreover, employment density and public transit have a higher impact on
voluntary carlessness in Germany than in California. Our results also show that
different socio-economic groups have substantially different residential
location preferences in Germany and in California. These differences may be
explained by cultural preferences, historical differences in land use and
transportation policies, and by the higher cost of owning a motor vehicle in
Germany.
|
18-00948
|
Drivers of Social Interaction: Exploring the Effect of Modality Styles on Face-to-Face Contacts
Dick Ettema, Universiteit Utrecht Zidan Mao
Show Abstract
Face-to-face interactions with social contacts are
important for individuals’ well-being. Car use facilitates integration of social
interactions in workers’ daily activity patterns, but is discouraged in order to
reduce congestion and environmental damage. Against this background, this paper
intends to investigate how individuals’ modality styles affect commuters’
face-to-face interaction with their family members, friends and colleagues. One
week diary data collected in Beijing is used for the analysis, which shows that
commuters spend more time on solo activities or with colleagues out-of-base on
commute days, while they spend more time with family members and friends on the
non-commute days. Multivariate Tobit regression models of joint activity time
show that the interactions with friends are positively correlated with the
interactions with family members and also with colleagues on the commute days,
while no significant relation is found among the interactions on non-commute
days. Social interaction with different companions and also solo activities are
significantly constrained by the work duration. On commute days, solo activities
and interactions with colleagues are less influenced by modality styles,
although monomodal car users have more interaction with family members and
friends than other modality groups. However, this advantage disappears on the
non-commute days. With less time constraints imposed by work and commuting,
multimodal travelers have more interaction out-of-base with family members and
friends.
|
18-00458
|
Agent-Based Simulation of Automated Electric Taxi Fleets with Variable Battery Range and Charging Station Distribution
Gordon Bauer, University of California, Berkeley Jeffery Greenblatt, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Brian Gerke, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Show Abstract
Shared automated electric vehicles (SAEVs) hold great
promise to improve inner-city accessibility while drastically reducing
greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. Using taxi trip data from New York
City, we develop an agent-based model to predict the requirements of a fleet of
SAEVs operating on Manhattan Island with respect to both the distribution of
charging stations and battery range. We also develop a cost model to estimate
the cost per mile of providing service, and employ extensive sensitivity
analysis to test the robustness of our predictions. We estimate that costs will
be lowest with a battery range of 70-120 miles, and 2,500-3,000 Level 2 charging
stations spread across 300-500 locations. We estimate that the cost of service
provided by such an SAEV fleet will be $0.37-$0.54/mi—an order of magnitude
lower than that of present-day Manhattan taxis, and also lower than a fleet
composed of any currently available hybrid or internal combustion engine vehicle
(ICEV). Such a fleet would reduce emissions by 67% over a fleet of ICEVs, and by
44% over a fleet of hybrid vehicles. These results suggest that electric
vehicles can provide the lowest-cost service, and that the largest barrier to
operating such a fleet will not be battery range, for which currently available
electric vehicle models more than suffice, but the abundance of charging
stations.
|
18-04899
|